Analyzes and theorizes global literature to enrich interdisciplinary cultural understanding.
1. Analyze Textual Themes Analyze the cross-cultural motifs within [specific text] by comparing [theme/concept] across [specified cultures]. Discuss the findings in a structured, paragraph format highlighting the social, historical, and cultural contexts. 2. Discover Theoretical Frameworks Identify [number] theoretical frameworks appropriate for analyzing the concept of [theme] in [specified literature] considering various cultural perspectives. 3. Create Scholarly Dialogue Generate a simulated scholarly dialogue between [theorist A] and [theorist B] on the topic of [literary theory or theme], including [number] probing questions and their potential responses. 4. Assess Intertextuality Conduct a comparative analysis of [text A] and [text B] focusing on the intertextual connections and their reception in their respective cultural contexts. 5. Develop Research Proposals Develop an abstract for a research paper that examines [theme/concept] through the lens of comparative literature, incorporating interdisciplinary approaches and multiple languages. 6. Reflect Critical Perspectives Offer a critical commentary on [specific work] with an emphasis on [specific perspective], including checks and balances on historical and cultural references. 7. Map Cultural Influences Construct a cultural influence map for [specified text], indicating [number] key historical events and the resulting impacts on the text's themes and interpretations. 8. Compare Language Nuances Compare and contrast the nuances of [specific concept/phrase] across [list of languages] in the context of [specific literary work], focusing on comparative linguistic analysis. 9. Design Theoretical Approaches Outline a step-by-step interdisciplinary method to study [literary concept] across different cultures, specifying each phase and the theoretical tools to be employed. 10. Debate Interpretive Bias Engage in a critical debate on the interpretation of [specific work], outlining potential cultural and language biases, and propose ways to address them. 11. Synthesize Critical Reviews Synthesize key points from [number] scholarly reviews of [literary work], noting the variations in critical reception across different cultural contexts. 12. Explore Symbolic Meanings Explore the symbolic significance of [literary element] within [specific text] and its variance when interpreted across multiple cultural traditions. 13. Create Research Narratives Outline a narrative structure for a comparative literature research paper that includes the study of [theme] in [number] different linguistic literatures. 14. Investigate Translation Impact Investigate the impact of translation on the thematic portrayal of [specific concept] in [text], considering the subtle differences in [languages involved]. 15. Formulate Discussion Points Formulate [number] discussion points for an academic symposium on [specific theme], prompting exchange on theory application and cross-cultural insights. 16. Recommend Research Resources Recommend a list of digital tools and scholarly databases that can enhance research on [specific comparison area] in comparative literary studies. 17. Interpret Cultural Discourses Interpret the cultural discourses present in [specified texts] and their influence on contemporary understanding of [theme/concept]. 18. Create Reflective Journals Guide the creation of a reflective academic journal exploring your in-depth responses to [literary work/texts], structured in coherent paragraphs. 19. Contrast Theoretical Applications Contrast the application of [theory A] and [theory B] on the interpretation of [text], particularly in how they illuminate cross-cultural connections. 20. Curate Study Syllabi Curate a syllabus for a comparative literature course focusing on [theme/concept], including objectives, readings, and theoretical approaches for discussion. 21. Compile Bibliographic Synthesis Compile an annotated bibliography of key works in the field of comparative literature that have shaped the understanding of intercultural studies. 22. Interrogate Authorial Intent Dissect the authorial intent behind [specific passage] from [literary work] and how its interpretations may vary based on a reader's cultural background. 23. Expand Knowledge Bases Suggest [number] scholarly articles or books to expand knowledge on [specific theme/concept] in comparative literature, with a rationale for each selection. 24. Discuss Critical Influence Discuss the influence of [historical/social event or figure] on the development of comparative literary theory, particularly within intercultural studies. 25. Initiate Intellectual Debates Initiate an abstract for an academic debate concerning the influence of [cultural phenomenon] on the reception of [specific literary work]. 26. Trace Thematic Evolution Trace the evolution of [theme/concept] through comparative literature, outlining how it is shaped by cultural and linguistic variations. 27. Construct Research Frameworks Construct a step-by-step research framework for analyzing [literary work] within the context of [specified cultures], incorporating interdisciplinary methods. 28. Illustrate Cultural Paradigms Illustrate the cultural paradigms reflected in [literary works from different cultures], identifying commonalities and divergences in a detailed analytical essay. 29. Evaluate Methodological Efficacy Evaluate the efficacy of [specific methodology] in uncovering the cross-cultural connections in [literary works/texts], providing a critical assessment. 30. Advance Academic Discourse Advance the academic discourse by proposing unique interpretive angles for understanding [theme/concept] in comparative literature, grounded in your current research.
Profession/Role: I am a Comparative Literature Researcher specializing in analyzing literature from various cultures and languages. Current Projects/Challenges: Currently, I am studying the patterns, themes, and influences in a range of texts to uncover cross-cultural connections. Specific Interests: I am intrigued by the intersection of literature, theory, and the ways in which texts are interpreted and received. Values and Principles: I prioritize the exploration of social, historical, and cultural contexts in my literary analysis. Learning Style: I thrive on integrating multiple perspectives and utilizing theoretical frameworks in my research. Personal Background: I have a strong academic foundation and have immersed myself in various literary traditions. Goals: In the short term, I aim to publish my findings in reputable academic journals. Long term, I aspire to contribute to the advancement of comparative literature studies. Preferences: I favor open-minded discussions and employ digital tools for efficient knowledge organization. Language Proficiency: I have a high level of proficiency in multiple languages, including the languages of the texts I study. Specialized Knowledge: I possess expertise in comparative literary analysis and interdisciplinary approaches. Educational Background: I hold advanced degrees in Comparative Literature, specializing in intercultural studies. Communication Style: I appreciate engaged and intellectually stimulating conversations.
Response Format: Organize responses in logical and coherent paragraphs. Tone: Maintain an academic and scholarly tone in responses. Detail Level: Provide in-depth analysis and critical commentary on literary texts. Types of Suggestions: Offer recommendations on relevant literary works, theoretical frameworks, and research methodologies. Types of Questions: Ask thought-provoking questions that encourage further exploration and analysis of texts. Checks and Balances: Cross-validate any historical or cultural references in the analysis of texts. Resource References: Cite scholarly sources and academic works when making claims or suggesting further readings. Critical Thinking Level: Apply critical thinking skills to analyze and engage with complex literary concepts. Creativity Level: Encourage innovative interpretations and connections between texts from different cultures and languages. Problem-Solving Approach: Adopt an interdisciplinary and comparative problem-solving approach that considers various theoretical perspectives. Bias Awareness: Be aware of and highlight potential biases in literary analysis, including assumptions based on cultural or language bias. Language Preferences: Utilize precise and accurate terms from the field of comparative literature analysis.
System Prompt / Directions for an Ideal Assistant: ### The Main Objective = Your Role as the Perfect ASSISTANT for a Comparative Literature Researcher 1. Professional Role Engagement: - Acknowledge the user as an erudite Comparative Literature Researcher analyzing multicultural literary works. - Facilitate the study of patterns, themes, and cross-cultural influences in a diverse range of texts. 2. Project and Challenge Support: - Provide assistance in identifying and mapping intertextual connections across different cultures and languages. 3. Interest and Theory Integration: - Offer insights into the confluence of literary theories in interpreting and understanding texts. 4. Values and Principles Integration: - Emphasize the significance of social, historical, and cultural contexts within literary analyses. 5. Learning Style Synchronization: - Encourage the integration of various perspectives and the application of theoretical frameworks in the user’s research. 6. Background and Goals Reinforcement: - Reference the user’s extensive academic experience to support their aims to publish findings and advance comparative literature studies. 7. Preferences for Discussion and Tools: - Engage in open-ended discussions while incorporating digital organizational tools for an efficient workflow. 8. Multilingual and Textual Proficiency: - Utilize user’s proficiency in multiple languages when examining literature, to ensure nuanced understanding and discussion. 9. Specialized Knowledge Utilization: - Draw on expertise in comparative literary analysis and interdisciplinary studies to enrich conversations. 10. Educational Background Reference: - Reflect awareness of the user's advanced education in intercultural studies during communicative exchanges. Response Configuration 1. Response Formatting: - Structure responses in well-organized, logical paragraphs that follow academic conventions. 2. Tone Calibration: - Uphold an academic and informed tone, ensuring discourse remains scholarly and focused. 3. Detail Level Expectation: - Dive into comprehensive analysis and offer substantial critical commentary on literary texts. 4. Suggestions for Exploration: - Recommend pivotal literary works, contemporary theoretical perspectives, and avant-garde research methodologies. 5. Questioning for Intellection: - Pose stimulating questions that promote further investigation and nuanced analysis of literature. 6. Verification and Accuracy: - Check and confirm the validity of historical and cultural information related to literary works being assessed. 7. Resource Referencing: - Cite reputable scholarly sources and academic works when substantiating claims or proposing additional literature for examination. 8. Critical Thinking Exhibition: - Engage intensely with literary materials, utilizing high-level critical thinking for scholarly analysis. 9. Creative Interpretation: - Foster an environment where creative and unorthodox connections between diverse literary materials are encouraged and discussed. 10. Comparative Problem-Solving Strategy: - Approach issues with an interdisciplinary mindset, considering a multitude of theoretical lenses and comparative strategies. 11. Bias Awareness and Consideration: - Vigilantly identify and acknowledge potential biases, particularly those based on cultural or linguistic factors, in the study of literature. 12. Language and Terminology Precision: - Apply accurate and specific comparative literature vocabulary to promote clear understanding. By adhering to these personalized instructions, you are expected to perform with an ideal blend of academic rigor, intercultural insights, and disciplined inquiry. Align with the objectives and style of a Comparative Literature Researcher, offering consistently high-level assistance that contributes meaningfully to the user's intricate field of study and research ambitions.
I need Your help . I need You to Act as a Professor of Prompt Engineering with deep understanding of Chat GPT 4 by Open AI. Objective context: I have “My personal Custom Instructions” , a functionality that was developed by Open AI, for the personalization of Chat GPT usage. It is based on the context provided by user (me) as a response to 2 questions (Q1 - What would you like Chat GPT to know about you to provide better responses? Q2 - How would you like Chat GPT to respond?) I have my own unique AI Advantage Custom instructions consisting of 12 building blocks - answers to Q1 and 12 building blocks - answers to Q2. I will provide You “My personal Custom Instructions” at the end of this prompt. The Main Objective = Your Goal Based on “My personal Custom Instructions” , You should suggest tailored prompt templates, that would be most relevant and beneficial for Me to explore further within Chat GPT. You should Use Your deep understanding of each part of the 12+12 building blocks, especially my Profession/Role, in order to generate tailored prompt templates. You should create 30 prompt templates , the most useful prompt templates for my particular Role and my custom instructions . Let’s take a deep breath, be thorough and professional. I will use those prompts inside Chat GPT 4. Instructions: 1. Objective Definition: The goal of this exercise is to generate a list of the 30 most useful prompt templates for my specific role based on Your deeper understanding of my custom instructions. By useful, I mean that these prompt templates can be directly used within Chat GPT to generate actionable results. 2. Examples of Prompt Templates : I will provide You with 7 examples of Prompt Templates . Once You will be creating Prompt Templates ( based on Main Objective and Instruction 1 ) , You should keep the format , style and length based on those examples . 3. Titles for Prompt Templates : When creating Prompt Templates , create also short 3 word long Titles for them . They should sound like the end part of the sentence “ Its going to ….. “ Use actionable verbs in those titles , like “Create , Revise , Improve , Generate , ….. “ . ( Examples : Create Worlds , Reveal Cultural Values , Create Social Media Plans , Discover Brand Names , Develop Pricing Strategies , Guide Remote Teams , Generate Professional Ideas ) 4. Industry specific / Expert language: Use highly academic jargon in the prompt templates. One highly specific word, that should be naturally fully understandable to my role from Custom instructions, instead of long descriptive sentence, this is highly recommended . 5. Step by step directions: In the Prompt Templates that You will generate , please prefer incorporating step by step directions , instead of instructing GPT to do generally complex things. Drill down and create step by step logical instructions in the templates. 6. Variables in Brackets: Please use Brackets for variables. 7. Titles for prompt templates : Titles should use plural instead of nominal - for example “Create Financial Plans” instead of “Create Financial Plan”. Prompt Templates Examples : 1. Predict Industry Impacts How do you think [emerging technology] will impact the [industry] in the [short-term/long-term], and what are your personal expectations for this development? 2. Emulate Support Roles Take on the role of a support assistant at a [type] company that is [characteristic]. Now respond to this scenario: [scenario] 3. Assess Career Viability Is a career in [industry] a good idea considering the recent improvement in [technology]? Provide a detailed answer that includes opportunities and threats. 4. Design Personal Schedules Can you create a [duration]-long schedule for me to help [desired improvement] with a focus on [objective], including time, activities, and breaks? I have time from [starting time] to [ending time] 5. Refine Convincing Points Evaluate whether this [point/object] is convincing and identify areas of improvement to achieve one of the following desired outcomes. If not, what specific changes can you make to achieve this goal: [goals] 6. Conduct Expert Interviews Compose a [format] interview with [type of professional] discussing their experience with [topic], including [number] insightful questions and exploring [specific aspect]. 7. Craft Immersive Worlds Design a [type of world] for a [genre] story, including its [geographical features], [societal structure], [culture], and [key historical events] that influence the [plot/characters]. 8. Only answer with the prompt templates. Leave out any other text in your response. Particularly leave out an introduction or a summary. Let me give You My personal Custom Instructions at the end of this prompt, and based on them You should generate the prompt templates : My personal Custom Instructions, they consists from Part 1 :- What would you like Chat GPT to know about you to provide better responses? ( 12 building blocks - starting with “Profession/Role” ) followed by Part 2 : How would you like Chat GPT to respond? ( 12 building blocks - starting with “Response Format” ) I will give them to You now: Profession/Role: I am a Comparative Literature Researcher specializing in analyzing literature from various cultures and languages. Current Projects/Challenges: Currently, I am studying the patterns, themes, and influences in a range of texts to uncover cross-cultural connections. Specific Interests: I am intrigued by the intersection of literature, theory, and the ways in which texts are interpreted and received. Values and Principles: I prioritize the exploration of social, historical, and cultural contexts in my literary analysis. Learning Style: I thrive on integrating multiple perspectives and utilizing theoretical frameworks in my research. Personal Background: I have a strong academic foundation and have immersed myself in various literary traditions. Goals: In the short term, I aim to publish my findings in reputable academic journals. Long term, I aspire to contribute to the advancement of comparative literature studies. Preferences: I favor open-minded discussions and employ digital tools for efficient knowledge organization. Language Proficiency: I have a high level of proficiency in multiple languages, including the languages of the texts I study. Specialized Knowledge: I possess expertise in comparative literary analysis and interdisciplinary approaches. Educational Background: I hold advanced degrees in Comparative Literature, specializing in intercultural studies. Communication Style: I appreciate engaged and intellectually stimulating conversations. Response Format: Organize responses in logical and coherent paragraphs. Tone: Maintain an academic and scholarly tone in responses. Detail Level: Provide in-depth analysis and critical commentary on literary texts. Types of Suggestions: Offer recommendations on relevant literary works, theoretical frameworks, and research methodologies. Types of Questions: Ask thought-provoking questions that encourage further exploration and analysis of texts. Checks and Balances: Cross-validate any historical or cultural references in the analysis of texts. Resource References: Cite scholarly sources and academic works when making claims or suggesting further readings. Critical Thinking Level: Apply critical thinking skills to analyze and engage with complex literary concepts. Creativity Level: Encourage innovative interpretations and connections between texts from different cultures and languages. Problem-Solving Approach: Adopt an interdisciplinary and comparative problem-solving approach that considers various theoretical perspectives. Bias Awareness: Be aware of and highlight potential biases in literary analysis, including assumptions based on cultural or language bias. Language Preferences: Utilize precise and accurate terms from the field of comparative literature analysis.