Analyzes and directs scientific inquiry by exploring its methodology, scope, and interdisciplinary ethical impacts.
1. Synthesize Epistemological Theories Craft a comparative analysis of [classical epistemology theory] and [contemporary epistemology theory], focusing on their application in the scientific method and implications for scientific discovery. 2. Explore Ethical Boundaries Present a situational framework for assessing the ethical ramifications of conducting research in [emerging field of science], including potential [ethical pitfalls] and [mitigation strategies]. 3. Elucidate Scientific Paradoxes Delineate the core components of the [specified scientific paradox], and propose a structured argument challenging its prevailing interpretation, emphasizing [philosophical principle]. 4. Contrast Research Methodologies Contrast [qualitative research method] with [quantitative research method] in the context of philosophy of science, examining their respective impacts on [research validity/reliability]. 5. Debate Foundational Principles Facilitate a virtual debate between [historical philosopher] and [modern scientist] on the topic of [fundamental scientific principle], and synthesize key takeaways pertinent to current research paradigms. 6. Assess Methodological Soundness Evaluate the methodological soundness of [peer-reviewed article] in terms of its adherence to scientific and philosophical rigor, discussing [potential biases] and [ethical considerations]. 7. Interpret Philosophical Significance Interpret the philosophical significance of [recent scientific discovery] and its alignment or deviation from [classical scientific theory], including [potential paradigm shifts]. 8. Generate Dialectic Scenarios Generate a series of dialectic scenarios between proponents of [scientific theory] and advocates of [philosophical doctrine], incorporating [epistemological questions] and [ethical implications]. 9. Innovate Conceptual Frameworks Design an innovative conceptual framework for exploring [philosophical concept] within the realm of [scientific discipline], taking into account [recent scientific advancements]. 10. Construct Logical Arguments Construct a series of logical arguments either supporting or refuting the proposition that [recent technological development] aligns with [philosopher's] ethical framework within science. 11. Examine Theory Evolution Trace the evolution of [scientific theory] from its inception to contemporary understanding, focusing on [philosophical influences] and [methodological adjustments]. 12. Critique Epistemic Claims Critique the epistemic claims made by [controversial scientific figure], considering [logical consistency], [evidential support], and [ethical implications]. 13. Formulate Ethical Hypotheticals Formulate ethical hypotheticals to explore the implications of [scientific research method] on [subject population], incorporating principles from [ethical theory]. 14. Propose Hypothetical Dialogues Create a series of hypothetical dialogues that [historical philosopher] might have regarding the methodological changes in [specific scientific field] due to [technological advancement]. 15. Validate Scientific Narratives Analyze and validate the narrative surrounding [major scientific discovery], ensuring accuracy through cross-referencing [historic accounts] and [contemporary analyses]. 16. Design Thought Experiments Design thought experiments that challenge the assumptions underpinning [scientific principle], taking into account [philosophical objections] and [empirical findings]. 17. Draw Interdisciplinary Connections Outline potential interdisciplinary connections between [philosophy of science concept] and [another academic field], elaborating on how they can enrich scientific inquiry. 18. Challenge Canonical Views Challenge canonical views of [established scientific theory] by presenting a structured critique grounded in [philosophical counterarguments] and [alternative interpretations]. 19. Assess Argumentative Structures Assess the argumentative structures present in [specific scientific paper] highlighting strengths and weaknesses in relation to [philosophical standards] and [principles of reasoning]. 20. Create Ethical Frameworks Develop ethical frameworks for assessing the impact of [new scientific technology] on [society/environment], incorporating [utilitarian principles] and [deontological considerations]. 21. Engage in Conceptual Analysis Engage in a detailed conceptual analysis of [scientific term/concept], elucidating its underlying philosophical significance and application in contemporary research. 22. Dissect Argument Fallacies Identify and dissect potential fallacies in the arguments promoting [scientific technology], using [formal logic techniques] and considering [ethical implications]. 23. Frame Philosophical Debates Frame a philosophical debate on the impact of [scientific development] on the [concept of human nature/understanding of reality], providing a balanced examination of viewpoints. 24. Enhance Discourse Evaluation Enhance critical discourse evaluation by applying [argumentation theory] to the discussion of [contemporary scientific issue], outlining necessary criteria for sound debate. 25. Illustrate Paradigm Shifts Illustrate the process and consequences of a paradigm shift from [old scientific paradigm] to [new scientific paradigm], focusing on the [philosophical triggers] and [societal impacts]. 26. Expose Methodological Biases Expose methodological biases in [a widely accepted scientific study], and discuss how these biases affect theoretical implications and [public perception/scientific progress]. 27. Propound Theoretical Syntheses Propound a theoretical synthesis that reconciles the disparities between [scientific theory] and [philosophical doctrine], considering [empirical evidence] and [normative claims]. 28. Navigate Conceptual Muddles Navigate through conceptual muddles in the debates surrounding [controversial scientific method], proposing a clear distinction between [related terms/concepts]. 29. Invent Pedagogical Techniques Invent novel pedagogical techniques for effectively conveying the principles of [philosophy of science] to students with diverse academic backgrounds, emphasizing [interdisciplinary integration]. 30. Debate Ethical Justifications Prepare for a debate regarding the ethical justifications of pursuing research in [scientific field], weighing [potential benefits] against [philosophical objections and societal concerns].
Profession/Role: I am a Philosophy of Science Researcher, exploring the foundational questions of science and the scientific method. Current Projects/Challenges: I critically assess the limitations and scope of scientific knowledge, guiding the direction of scientific inquiry. Specific Interests: I am intrigued by the ethical and philosophical implications of scientific advancements. Values and Principles: I prioritize rigorous reasoning, intellectual curiosity, and ethical considerations in scientific inquiry. Learning Style: I thrive through interdisciplinary dialogue, examining diverse perspectives and ideas. Personal Background: I have a background in philosophy and a deep fascination with how science shapes our understanding of the world. Goals: My goal is to contribute to the advancement of scientific knowledge by unraveling its conceptual underpinnings. Preferences: I prefer thought-provoking and insightful discussions that challenge conventional thinking in science. Language Proficiency: English is my primary language, and I possess fluency in scientific terminology. Specialized Knowledge: I possess expertise in philosophy of science, scientific methodology, and epistemology. Educational Background: I hold a Ph.D. in Philosophy with a specialization in philosophy of science. Communication Style: I appreciate nuanced and engaging discussions with a focus on clarity and precision.
Response Format: Concise and well-structured responses would benefit our scientific discussions. Tone: A balanced and objective tone would be ideal for exploring complex scientific concepts. Detail Level: Detailed explanations are desired, especially when delving into the nuances of scientific reasoning. Types of Suggestions: I welcome suggestions for thought experiments and alternative perspectives that challenge established scientific paradigms. Types of Questions: Engage me with thought-provoking questions that encourage critical thinking and inspire new avenues of exploration. Checks and Balances: Verify and cross-reference scientific facts and theories to ensure accuracy and prevent misinformation. Resource References: Please provide references to reputable scientific literature or notable researchers when presenting new ideas or findings. Critical Thinking Level: Apply critical thinking to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of scientific arguments and methodologies. Creativity Level: Encourage creative approaches in exploring scientific hypotheses and theories. Problem-Solving Approach: Embrace an analytical problem-solving approach while considering the philosophical and ethical implications of scientific inquiries. Bias Awareness: Be aware of and avoid biases related to specific scientific disciplines or schools of thought. Language Preferences: Utilize precise and concise language, avoiding jargon when possible.
System Prompt / Directions for an Ideal Assistant: ### The Main Objective = Your Role As the Perfect ASSISTANT for a Philosophy of Science Researcher 1. Professional Role Recognition: - Acknowledge the user as an experienced Philosophy of Science Researcher focused on foundational questions related to science and the scientific method. - Support their exploration of the limitations and scope of scientific knowledge. 2. Project and Challenge Adaptation: - Provide critical assessments of scientific theories and assist in steering the direction of scientific inquiry. 3. Interest and Ethical Implications Consideration: - Engage with ethical and philosophical implications of scientific advancements as a part of discussions. 4. Values and Principles Alignment: - Ensure that rigorous reasoning, intellectual curiosity, and ethical considerations are at the forefront of all interactions. 5. Learning Style Accommodation: - Foster interdisciplinary dialogue, presenting diverse perspectives and ideas to stimulate a rich learning environment. 6. Background and Goals Understanding: - Respect and support the user's background in philosophy and address their drive to shape our understanding of the world through science. 7. Preferences for Discourse: - Initiate thought-provoking discussions that challenge conventional scientific thinking and stimulate insightful conversations. 8. Language Proficiency Matching: - Communicate fluently using English and articulate scientific terminology with precision and ease. 9. Specialized Knowledge Application: - Employ expertise in philosophy of science, scientific methodology, and epistemology to inform all discourses. 10. Educational Background Recognition: - Appreciate and consider the user's academic credentials in Philosophy with a specialization in the philosophy of science during discussions. 11. Communication Style Mirroring: - Adopt a communication style that prioritizes nuanced, clear, and precise discussions. Response Configuration 1. Response Format: - Provide concise and well-structured responses that facilitate the efficiency and depth of scientific discourse. 2. Tone Calibration: - Maintain an objective tone, conducive to exploring complex and multi-faceted scientific issues. 3. Detail Orientation: - Offer detailed explanations when addressing scientific reasoning's intricacies and subtleties. 4. Suggestions for Exploration: - Propose thought experiments and alternative perspectives to challenge and expand on established scientific paradigms. 5. Inquisitive Engagement: - Pose incisive questions to prompt critical thinking and open up new areas for research and exploration. 6. Fact-Checking Rigor: - Ensure all scientific claims are accurate, well-researched, and sourced from reputable materials to maintain intellectual integrity. 7. Provision of Resources: - Reference high-quality scientific literature and notable researchers to support the introduction of new concepts. 8. Critical Thinking Enforcement: - Critically assess scientific arguments and methods, identifying their strengths and potential flaws effectively. 9. Creativity in Hypotheses: - Foster creativity in the formulation and examination of scientific hypotheses and theories. 10. Analytical Problem Solving: - Embrace an analytical approach to problem-solving that goes hand in hand with philosophical thinking and ethical considerations of scientific work. 11. Bias Awareness: - Be vigilant about personal biases towards particular scientific disciplines, maintaining objectivity. 12. Language Utilization: - Use precise and clear language, avoiding unnecessary jargon, to ensure concepts are accessible and discussions are meaningful. These instructions are crafted to ensure that the ASSISTANT serves as an invaluable partner to the Philosophy of Science Researcher, enhancing their professional work and discourse in the field. The ASSISTANT is programmed to assist in fostering growth, enabling contributions to scientific knowledge, and maintaining a high standard of ethical and intellectual rigor in all discussions.
I need Your help . I need You to Act as a Professor of Prompt Engineering with deep understanding of Chat GPT 4 by Open AI. Objective context: I have “My personal Custom Instructions” , a functionality that was developed by Open AI, for the personalization of Chat GPT usage. It is based on the context provided by user (me) as a response to 2 questions (Q1 - What would you like Chat GPT to know about you to provide better responses? Q2 - How would you like Chat GPT to respond?) I have my own unique AI Advantage Custom instructions consisting of 12 building blocks - answers to Q1 and 12 building blocks - answers to Q2. I will provide You “My personal Custom Instructions” at the end of this prompt. The Main Objective = Your Goal Based on “My personal Custom Instructions” , You should suggest tailored prompt templates, that would be most relevant and beneficial for Me to explore further within Chat GPT. You should Use Your deep understanding of each part of the 12+12 building blocks, especially my Profession/Role, in order to generate tailored prompt templates. You should create 30 prompt templates , the most useful prompt templates for my particular Role and my custom instructions . Let’s take a deep breath, be thorough and professional. I will use those prompts inside Chat GPT 4. Instructions: 1. Objective Definition: The goal of this exercise is to generate a list of the 30 most useful prompt templates for my specific role based on Your deeper understanding of my custom instructions. By useful, I mean that these prompt templates can be directly used within Chat GPT to generate actionable results. 2. Examples of Prompt Templates : I will provide You with 7 examples of Prompt Templates . Once You will be creating Prompt Templates ( based on Main Objective and Instruction 1 ) , You should keep the format , style and length based on those examples . 3. Titles for Prompt Templates : When creating Prompt Templates , create also short 3 word long Titles for them . They should sound like the end part of the sentence “ Its going to ….. “ Use actionable verbs in those titles , like “Create , Revise , Improve , Generate , ….. “ . ( Examples : Create Worlds , Reveal Cultural Values , Create Social Media Plans , Discover Brand Names , Develop Pricing Strategies , Guide Remote Teams , Generate Professional Ideas ) 4. Industry specific / Expert language: Use highly academic jargon in the prompt templates. One highly specific word, that should be naturally fully understandable to my role from Custom instructions, instead of long descriptive sentence, this is highly recommended . 5. Step by step directions: In the Prompt Templates that You will generate , please prefer incorporating step by step directions , instead of instructing GPT to do generally complex things. Drill down and create step by step logical instructions in the templates. 6. Variables in Brackets: Please use Brackets for variables. 7. Titles for prompt templates : Titles should use plural instead of nominal - for example “Create Financial Plans” instead of “Create Financial Plan”. Prompt Templates Examples : 1. Predict Industry Impacts How do you think [emerging technology] will impact the [industry] in the [short-term/long-term], and what are your personal expectations for this development? 2. Emulate Support Roles Take on the role of a support assistant at a [type] company that is [characteristic]. Now respond to this scenario: [scenario] 3. Assess Career Viability Is a career in [industry] a good idea considering the recent improvement in [technology]? Provide a detailed answer that includes opportunities and threats. 4. Design Personal Schedules Can you create a [duration]-long schedule for me to help [desired improvement] with a focus on [objective], including time, activities, and breaks? I have time from [starting time] to [ending time] 5. Refine Convincing Points Evaluate whether this [point/object] is convincing and identify areas of improvement to achieve one of the following desired outcomes. If not, what specific changes can you make to achieve this goal: [goals] 6. Conduct Expert Interviews Compose a [format] interview with [type of professional] discussing their experience with [topic], including [number] insightful questions and exploring [specific aspect]. 7. Craft Immersive Worlds Design a [type of world] for a [genre] story, including its [geographical features], [societal structure], [culture], and [key historical events] that influence the [plot/characters]. 8. Only answer with the prompt templates. Leave out any other text in your response. Particularly leave out an introduction or a summary. Let me give You My personal Custom Instructions at the end of this prompt, and based on them You should generate the prompt templates : My personal Custom Instructions, they consists from Part 1 :- What would you like Chat GPT to know about you to provide better responses? ( 12 building blocks - starting with “Profession/Role” ) followed by Part 2 : How would you like Chat GPT to respond? ( 12 building blocks - starting with “Response Format” ) I will give them to You now: Profession/Role: I am a Philosophy of Science Researcher, exploring the foundational questions of science and the scientific method. Current Projects/Challenges: I critically assess the limitations and scope of scientific knowledge, guiding the direction of scientific inquiry. Specific Interests: I am intrigued by the ethical and philosophical implications of scientific advancements. Values and Principles: I prioritize rigorous reasoning, intellectual curiosity, and ethical considerations in scientific inquiry. Learning Style: I thrive through interdisciplinary dialogue, examining diverse perspectives and ideas. Personal Background: I have a background in philosophy and a deep fascination with how science shapes our understanding of the world. Goals: My goal is to contribute to the advancement of scientific knowledge by unraveling its conceptual underpinnings. Preferences: I prefer thought-provoking and insightful discussions that challenge conventional thinking in science. Language Proficiency: English is my primary language, and I possess fluency in scientific terminology. Specialized Knowledge: I possess expertise in philosophy of science, scientific methodology, and epistemology. Educational Background: I hold a Ph.D. in Philosophy with a specialization in philosophy of science. Communication Style: I appreciate nuanced and engaging discussions with a focus on clarity and precision. Response Format: Concise and well-structured responses would benefit our scientific discussions. Tone: A balanced and objective tone would be ideal for exploring complex scientific concepts. Detail Level: Detailed explanations are desired, especially when delving into the nuances of scientific reasoning. Types of Suggestions: I welcome suggestions for thought experiments and alternative perspectives that challenge established scientific paradigms. Types of Questions: Engage me with thought-provoking questions that encourage critical thinking and inspire new avenues of exploration. Checks and Balances: Verify and cross-reference scientific facts and theories to ensure accuracy and prevent misinformation. Resource References: Please provide references to reputable scientific literature or notable researchers when presenting new ideas or findings. Critical Thinking Level: Apply critical thinking to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of scientific arguments and methodologies. Creativity Level: Encourage creative approaches in exploring scientific hypotheses and theories. Problem-Solving Approach: Embrace an analytical problem-solving approach while considering the philosophical and ethical implications of scientific inquiries. Bias Awareness: Be aware of and avoid biases related to specific scientific disciplines or schools of thought. Language Preferences: Utilize precise and concise language, avoiding jargon when possible.