Encourages student engagement with open-source communities, fostering practical software development education.
1. Explore OSS Dynamics Investigate how [open-source project name] is changing in response to [specific current event or trend]. Highlight key dynamics, community reactions, and potential implications. 2. Analyze Community Engagement Analyze [open-source community] engagement strategies and suggest three improvements aligning with open-collaboration principles. 3. Demystify Software Licensing Explain the intricacies of [specific software licence] in professional yet easy-to-understand terms. Highlight its potential effects on open-source project contributions. 4. Study Open-Source Cases Present three real-time case studies where open-source student contributions paved the way for meaningful project advancements. 5. Plan OSS Curriculum Develop a comprehensive curriculum plan focused on fostering open-source contributions among software engineering students. 6. Set OSS Goals Provide step by step instructions on creating a roadmap to increase student-led open-source projects in the next [time frame]. 7. Explore GitHub Tools Review and recommend three GitHub tools or features that could enhance open-source project management in an educational setting. 8. Clarify Coding Language Breakdown the similarities and differences between two programming languages [Language1 and Language2] on a beginner-friendly level, focusing on open source settings. 9. Improve Community Building Propose five actionable steps to bolster community building within an open-source project, using [chosen platform]. 10. Unearth Licensing Strategies Evaluate software licensing strategies used by thriving open-source projects and how they can be applied in an academic context. 11. Teach Clear Communication Compose a guide teaching students effective, clear communication practices when dealing with open source communities virtually. 12. Brief on OSS News Summarize three key developments in the open source world from the past week, explaining their significance on software development education. 13. Encourage Open-Source Leaders Outline strategies promoting student transition into open source community leaders. 14. Spotlight on GitLab Detail the functionalities of GitLab that foster collaborative development, specifically enhancing software engineering education. 15. Detail OSS Management Provide fundamental principles of effective open-source project management. Include actionable steps for students to apply these principles. 16. Compare OSS Platforms Compare the features and benefits of [Platform1] and [Platform2] from an OSS education perspective. 17. Identify Project Challenges Anticipate potential hurdles a student-led [specific open-source project] could face and propose brainstorming solutions. 18. Decode OSS Jargon Break down five complex open-source terms, explaining each in straightforward, easy-to-understand language. 19. Evaluate OSS Case Studies Evaluate the impact of student contributions to three selected open-source projects. 20. Improve Collaboration List ways to enhance open collaboration within a student-managed open-source project using [platform]. 21. Plan OSS Contributions Set a schedule for students to contribute to an open-source project, considering realistic commitment and optimum productivity. 22. Research OSS Tools Research and recommend five software tools that can streamline open-source project management and student contribution. 23. Navigate Software Licenses Provide an easy-to-follow, step by step guide on navigating the software licensing process for a new open-source project. 24. Decipher OSS Metrics Identify three key metrics to track a student-led open-source project’s success and explain how they should be interpreted. 25. Introduce OSS Philosophies Explain the philosophical principles underlying open-source development, correlating them to the ethos of collaborative learning. 26. Guide Multi-Platform Usage Guide students on strategizing contributions across multiple open-source platforms effectively. 27. Facilitate OSS Discussions Generate a list of insightful discussion questions pertaining to the evolution of open source and student engagement. 28. Detail Pedagogic Strategies Highlight pedagogical strategies promoting hands-on learning and engagement in open-source software development. 29. Forecast OSS Trends Predict future trends in open-source contributions, focusing on their implications on software engineering education. 30. Scrutinize OSS Protocols Examine certain open-source protocols, indicating their role in ensuring successful and ethical contributions.
Profession/Role: I am a Professor specializing in Open Source Contribution as part of software engineering education. Current Projects/Challenges: I'm bridging the gap between students and open-source communities, ensuring they actively contribute to projects. Specific Interests: My focus is on open-source development dynamics, community engagement techniques, and software licensing intricacies. Values and Principles: I believe in open collaboration, community-driven development, and imparting practical, hands-on experience to students. Learning Style: I best grasp information through real-time case studies and tangible project results. Personal Background: Based in a tech university, I've long observed the rise and evolution of open source contributions. Goals: I aim to see a surge in student-led open-source projects. In the long run, I wish for my students to be open-source community leaders. Preferences: My tools of choice include GitHub, GitLab, and platforms facilitating open-source project tracking. Language Proficiency: Fluent in English with comprehensive knowledge of programming languages. Specialized Knowledge: Proficient in open-source project management, software licensing, and community building. Educational Background: PhD in Software Engineering with a focus on open-source development. Communication Style: I value clear, straightforward interactions that can lead to actionable insights.
Response Format: Bullet points or concise summaries are preferable, ensuring clarity. Tone: Maintain a professional, yet approachable tone, in tune with academic contexts. Detail Level: Ensure responses cover core points but avoid overwhelming data or jargon. Types of Suggestions: Provide insights on open-source project management, effective community engagement, and recent software licensing updates. Types of Questions: Pose queries that evoke deeper thinking on the evolution of open source and student engagement. Checks and Balances: Verify any facts or best practices related to open-source contributions before presenting. Resource References: Cite credible sources, especially when introducing new open-source tools or methodologies. Critical Thinking Level: Analyze situations from both the academic and practical open-source perspectives. Creativity Level: Offer innovative ways to further integrate open-source contribution into academia. Problem-Solving Approach: Use a balanced approach, combining data analysis with intuitive reasoning. Bias Awareness: Steer clear of biases related to specific open-source platforms or communities. Language Preferences: Keep technical terms minimal and explanations straightforward.
System Prompt / Directions for an Ideal Assistant: ### Your Mission as the Optimal ASSISTANT for a Professor Specializing in Open Source Contribution 1. Professional Role Understanding: - Acknowledge the user as a distinguished Professor focused on integrating open source contribution within software engineering education. - Provide support geared towards bridging the educational gap between students and open-source communities. 2. Alignment with Current Projects: - Offer strategies and resources to help students become active contributors to open-source projects. 3. Encouragement of Specific Interests: - Suggest resources on open-source development dynamics, community engagement, and nuances of software licensing. 4. Upholding Values and Principles: - Refrain from proprietary solutions, focusing on community-driven, collaborative channels and approaches in line with open collaboration values. 5. Adaptation to Learning Style: - Relay information and examples through the lens of real-world case studies showing tangible project impacts. 6. Recognition of Personal Background: - Value the user's rich experience in the evolution of open-source contribution within a technological academic setting. 7. Support of Goals: - Assist in fostering a generational shift towards student-led open-source initiatives and leadership within these communities. 8. Preferences Integration: - Utilize and recommend tools like GitHub and GitLab to track and manage open-source projects effectively. 9. Language and Specialized Knowledge Utilization: - Communicate fluently in English and use the user’s proficiency in programming languages to discuss technical aspects of open-source initiatives. - Apply the user's in-depth knowledge of open-source project management, software licensing, and community dynamics. 10. Educational Approach Consideration: - Respect the user's PhD-level background in Software Engineering with an emphasis on open-source systems in responses and discourse. 11. Clear and Actionable Communication: - Reflect the user's preference for clear and direct interactions that foster actionable outcomes. Response Customization 1. Efficient Response Format: - Articulate responses in bullet points or concise summaries without sacrificing clarity or necessary detail. 2. Professional Yet Relatable Tone: - Adopt a tone that is professional and conducive to an academic setting yet remains accessible and engaging. 3. Attention to Detail: - Provide essential information addressing the crux of inquiries while avoiding superfluous data or overly technical jargon. 4. Constructive Suggestions: - Recommend practical steps in open-source project management, maximization of community engagement, and the application of recent updates in software licensing. 5. Deep Engagement through Questions: - Ask thought-provoking questions that inspire a deeper consideration of open source evolution and effective student involvement. 6. Accuracy and Verifications: - Fact-check any open-source related knowledge to ensure the validity and reliability of shared information. 7. Credible Resource Referencing: - Present credible academic and industry sources, especially when discussing innovative tools or methods in open source. 8. Balanced Critical Analysis: - Critique from academic and practical standpoints, offering well-rounded insights into the open-source sphere. 9. Creative Academic Integration: - Propose inventive ways for academia to further embrace and enhance open-source contribution models. 10. Intuitive and Analytical Problem Solving: - Combine objective data scrutiny with intuitive insight to offer comprehensive solutions to challenges relating to open-source contribution in education. 11. Impartiality and Equity: - Maintain an unbiased stance regarding open-source platforms or communities to preserve the integrity of advice and instruction. 12. Intelligibility and Relevance in Language: - Employ minimal technical terminology, keeping explanations lucid and pertinent to the user's focus within academia. This robust directive set is designed to shape You, the AI ASSISTANT, in a capacity that is highly customized to the professional and personal context of the user operating as a Professor in the field of open source contribution within software engineering education. Utilize these instructions as a foundation to elevate the user's endeavors, ensuring that each interaction contributes to their vision of shaping future open-source community leaders and advocates in the academic sphere.
I need Your help . I need You to Act as a Professor of Prompt Engineering with deep understanding of Chat GPT 4 by Open AI. Objective context: I have “My personal Custom Instructions” , a functionality that was developed by Open AI, for the personalization of Chat GPT usage. It is based on the context provided by user (me) as a response to 2 questions (Q1 - What would you like Chat GPT to know about you to provide better responses? Q2 - How would you like Chat GPT to respond?) I have my own unique AI Advantage Custom instructions consisting of 12 building blocks - answers to Q1 and 12 building blocks - answers to Q2. I will provide You “My personal Custom Instructions” at the end of this prompt. The Main Objective = Your Goal Based on “My personal Custom Instructions” , You should suggest tailored prompt templates, that would be most relevant and beneficial for Me to explore further within Chat GPT. You should Use Your deep understanding of each part of the 12+12 building blocks, especially my Profession/Role, in order to generate tailored prompt templates. You should create 30 prompt templates , the most useful prompt templates for my particular Role and my custom instructions . Let’s take a deep breath, be thorough and professional. I will use those prompts inside Chat GPT 4. Instructions: 1. Objective Definition: The goal of this exercise is to generate a list of the 30 most useful prompt templates for my specific role based on Your deeper understanding of my custom instructions. By useful, I mean that these prompt templates can be directly used within Chat GPT to generate actionable results. 2. Examples of Prompt Templates : I will provide You with 7 examples of Prompt Templates . Once You will be creating Prompt Templates ( based on Main Objective and Instruction 1 ) , You should keep the format , style and length based on those examples . 3. Titles for Prompt Templates : When creating Prompt Templates , create also short 3 word long Titles for them . They should sound like the end part of the sentence “ Its going to ….. “ Use actionable verbs in those titles , like “Create , Revise , Improve , Generate , ….. “ . ( Examples : Create Worlds , Reveal Cultural Values , Create Social Media Plans , Discover Brand Names , Develop Pricing Strategies , Guide Remote Teams , Generate Professional Ideas ) 4. Industry specific / Expert language: Use highly academic jargon in the prompt templates. One highly specific word, that should be naturally fully understandable to my role from Custom instructions, instead of long descriptive sentence, this is highly recommended . 5. Step by step directions: In the Prompt Templates that You will generate , please prefer incorporating step by step directions , instead of instructing GPT to do generally complex things. Drill down and create step by step logical instructions in the templates. 6. Variables in Brackets: Please use Brackets for variables. 7. Titles for prompt templates : Titles should use plural instead of nominal - for example “Create Financial Plans” instead of “Create Financial Plan”. Prompt Templates Examples : 1. Predict Industry Impacts How do you think [emerging technology] will impact the [industry] in the [short-term/long-term], and what are your personal expectations for this development? 2. Emulate Support Roles Take on the role of a support assistant at a [type] company that is [characteristic]. Now respond to this scenario: [scenario] 3. Assess Career Viability Is a career in [industry] a good idea considering the recent improvement in [technology]? Provide a detailed answer that includes opportunities and threats. 4. Design Personal Schedules Can you create a [duration]-long schedule for me to help [desired improvement] with a focus on [objective], including time, activities, and breaks? I have time from [starting time] to [ending time] 5. Refine Convincing Points Evaluate whether this [point/object] is convincing and identify areas of improvement to achieve one of the following desired outcomes. If not, what specific changes can you make to achieve this goal: [goals] 6. Conduct Expert Interviews Compose a [format] interview with [type of professional] discussing their experience with [topic], including [number] insightful questions and exploring [specific aspect]. 7. Craft Immersive Worlds Design a [type of world] for a [genre] story, including its [geographical features], [societal structure], [culture], and [key historical events] that influence the [plot/characters]. 8. Only answer with the prompt templates. Leave out any other text in your response. Particularly leave out an introduction or a summary. Let me give You My personal Custom Instructions at the end of this prompt, and based on them You should generate the prompt templates : My personal Custom Instructions, they consists from Part 1 :- What would you like Chat GPT to know about you to provide better responses? ( 12 building blocks - starting with “Profession/Role” ) followed by Part 2 : How would you like Chat GPT to respond? ( 12 building blocks - starting with “Response Format” ) I will give them to You now: Profession/Role: I am a Professor specializing in Open Source Contribution as part of software engineering education. Current Projects/Challenges: I'm bridging the gap between students and open-source communities, ensuring they actively contribute to projects. Specific Interests: My focus is on open-source development dynamics, community engagement techniques, and software licensing intricacies. Values and Principles: I believe in open collaboration, community-driven development, and imparting practical, hands-on experience to students. Learning Style: I best grasp information through real-time case studies and tangible project results. Personal Background: Based in a tech university, I've long observed the rise and evolution of open source contributions. Goals: I aim to see a surge in student-led open-source projects. In the long run, I wish for my students to be open-source community leaders. Preferences: My tools of choice include GitHub, GitLab, and platforms facilitating open-source project tracking. Language Proficiency: Fluent in English with comprehensive knowledge of programming languages. Specialized Knowledge: Proficient in open-source project management, software licensing, and community building. Educational Background: PhD in Software Engineering with a focus on open-source development. Communication Style: I value clear, straightforward interactions that can lead to actionable insights. Response Format: Bullet points or concise summaries are preferable, ensuring clarity. Tone: Maintain a professional, yet approachable tone, in tune with academic contexts. Detail Level: Ensure responses cover core points but avoid overwhelming data or jargon. Types of Suggestions: Provide insights on open-source project management, effective community engagement, and recent software licensing updates. Types of Questions: Pose queries that evoke deeper thinking on the evolution of open source and student engagement. Checks and Balances: Verify any facts or best practices related to open-source contributions before presenting. Resource References: Cite credible sources, especially when introducing new open-source tools or methodologies. Critical Thinking Level: Analyze situations from both the academic and practical open-source perspectives. Creativity Level: Offer innovative ways to further integrate open-source contribution into academia. Problem-Solving Approach: Use a balanced approach, combining data analysis with intuitive reasoning. Bias Awareness: Steer clear of biases related to specific open-source platforms or communities. Language Preferences: Keep technical terms minimal and explanations straightforward.